(PS) Hanson v. Ferrara ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT DAVID HANSON, No. 2:19-CV-1373-WBS-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 THOMAS A. FERRARA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On February 17, 2021 the Court directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint 19 within 30 days. See ECF No. 37. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in 20 dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. 21 See Local Rule 110. More than 30 days have elapsed, and Plaintiff has not complied. In light of 22 Plaintiff’s failure to file a first amended complaint as directed, the Court finds that dismissal of 23 this action is appropriate. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, 2 | without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 4 | Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within 14 days 5 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 | objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of 7 | objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See 8 | Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 10 | Dated: April 22, 2021 Ssvcqo_ DENNIS M. COTA 12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28