(PC) Lake v. Diaz ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN LAKE, No. 2:20-cv-2077 JAM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated January 20, 2021, the court screened the complaint and 19 determined it did not contain any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was given sixty 20 days leave to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to file an amended complaint 21 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those sixty days have passed, 22 and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested additional time to file an amended 23 complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. Accordingly, the court will recommend 24 that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 26 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 | with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 4 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 5 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 | Dated: April 26, 2021 7 8 9 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 1S | pp:12 16 DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/lake2077 f&r.fta 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28