(PC) Ramsey v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAVON LOVOWE RAMSEY, No. 2:21-cv-0535 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915. 21 The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial 22 district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the 23 district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions 24 giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action 25 is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in 26 this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal 27 jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 28 //// 1 In this case, the incidents took place at Salinas Valley State Prison; thus, the claims arose 2 || in Monterey County, which is in the Northern District of California. Therefore, plaintiffs claims 3 | should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 4 | In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the 5 || correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 6 || 1974). 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United 8 || States District Court for the Northern District of California. 9 | Dated: June 25, 2021 0 Fens Arn 11 KENDALL J. NE jrams053521 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28