- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALLEN YOCOM, Case No. 1:21-cv-00187-NONE-HBK 12 Petitioner, ORDER VACATING APRIL 12, 2021 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. (Doc. No. 17) 14 KATHLEEN ALLISON, LAURA ELDRIDGE, AND ATTORNEY ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO 15 GENERAL, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, 16 Respondents. AND DIRECTING SERVICE OF PETITON 17 (Doc. No. 1) 18 Petitioner Michael Allen Yocom, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a 19 petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). On April 12, 2021, this 20 court issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be dismissed for 21 petitioner’s failure to exhaust his claims. (Doc. No. 17). The court found that because petitioner 22 was currently seeking habeas relief before the California Supreme Court at the time of filing his 23 federal habeas petition, the federal petition was unexhausted and premature and should be 24 dismissed. (See generally id.). However, the court takes notice that petitioner’s habeas petition 25 before the California Supreme Court was denied review on April 28, 2021. See Yocom (Michael 26 Allen) on H.C., No. S266454 (Cal. Apr. 28, 2021). Because petitioner no longer has a case 27 28 1 pending in the state courts, the court will vacate the April 12, 2021 findings and 2 recommendations. (Doc. No. 17). 3 Accordingly, the court now reviews the petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 4 Section 2254 Cases. See R. Governing § 2254 Cases 4; 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Under Rule 4, a district 5 court must dismiss a habeas petition if it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. 6 See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 7 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, 8 the court will order the respondent to respond to the petition, set a briefing schedule, and direct 9 service. 10 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 11 1. The court’s April 12, 2021 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 17) are 12 VACATED. 13 2. Within sixty days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file a response 14 to the petition. 15 3. A response may be one of the following: 16 A. An answer addressing the merits of the petition. Any argument by 17 respondent that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised 18 in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner’s claims. 19 B. A motion to dismiss the petition. 20 4. Within sixty days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file all 21 transcripts and other documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the 22 petition. See R. Governing Section 2254 Cases 5(c). 23 5. If respondent files an answer to the petition, petitioner may file a reply within thirty 24 days of the date of service of respondent’s answer. If no reply is filed within thirty 25 days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted. 26 6. If respondent moves to dismiss, petitioner must file an opposition or statement of 27 non-opposition within twenty-one days of the date of service of respondent’s 28 motion. Any reply to an opposition to the motion to dismiss must be filed within 1 seven days after the opposition is served. The motion to dismiss will be considered 2 submitted twenty-eight days after the service of the motion or when the reply is 3 filed, whichever comes first. See Local Rule 230(). 4 7. Respondent must complete and return to the court within thirty days a form stating 5 whether respondent consents or declines to consent to the jurisdiction of a United 6 States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 8 636(c)(1). 7 8. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the state’s attorney 8 general or the state’s attorney general’s representative. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 10, 2021 Mile. Wh. foareh Zaskth 12 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA B UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00187
Filed Date: 5/10/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024