(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.E.S., Case No. 1:21-cv-000784-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND 13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE LONG FORM APPLICATION 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 2) 15 Defendant. TWENTY DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 Plaintiff J.E.S., by his guardian ad litem Katrina Martinez, filed a complaint on May 14, 19 2021, challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his 20 application for disability benefits. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead 21 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, upon 22 review of Plaintiff’s application, it does not entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment 23 of fees. 24 In order to proceed in court without prepayment of the filing fee, Plaintiff must submit an 25 affidavit demonstrating that she “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. 26 § 1915(a)(1). The right to proceed without prepayment of fees in a civil case is a privilege and 27 not a right. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 198 n.2 (1993); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1231 (9th Cir. 1984) (“permission to 1 proceed in forma pauperis is itself a matter of privilege and not right; denial of in forma pauperis 2 status does not violate the applicant’s right to due process”). A plaintiff need not be absolutely 3 destitute to proceed in forma pauperis and the application is sufficient if it states that due to his 4 poverty he is unable to pay the costs and still be able to provide himself and his dependents with 5 the necessities of life. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 6 Whether to grant or deny an application to proceed without prepayment of fees is an exercise of 7 the district court’s discretion. Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1236 (9th Cir. 2015). 8 In assessing whether a certain income level meets the poverty threshold under Section 9 1915(a)(1), courts look to the federal poverty guidelines developed each year by the Department 10 of Health and Human Services. See, e.g., Paco v. Myers, No. CIV. 13-00701 ACK, 2013 WL 11 6843057 (D. Haw. Dec. 26, 2013); Lint v. City of Boise, No. CV09-72-S-EJL, 2009 WL 12 1149442, at *2 (D. Idaho Apr. 28, 2009) (and cases cited therein). 13 Based on the income reported which is $3,200.00 per month, Plaintiff’s household 14 income is $38,400.00 per year. The 2021 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 contiguous states for a 15 household of four is $26,500.00. 2021 Poverty Guidelines, https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty- 16 guidelines (last visited May 17, 2021). Based on the information provided, the income is well 17 beyond the poverty level and it does not appear that Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without 18 prepayment of fees in this action. 19 Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to complete and file an Application to Proceed 20 in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) – AO 239. If Plaintiff is 21 unwilling to complete and submit the long form application, Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in 22 full. 23 Based upon the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice; 25 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward an in forma pauperis application 26 (Long Form) to Plaintiff; 27 / / / 1 3. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either (1) pay the 2 $402.00 filing fee for this action, or (2) file an application to proceed in forma 3 pauperis without prepayment of the fee; and 4 4. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action shall be dismissed. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf ee 7 | Dated: _May 17, 2021 _ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28