(PC) Woody v. Mnuchin ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN F. WOODY, JR., No. 2:20-cv-2328 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STEPHEN MNUCHIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed April 14, 2021, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis was 18 denied and he was ordered to pay the filing fee in full or face dismissal of this case. ECF No. 14. 19 The deadline to pay the filing fee has now passed and plaintiff has not paid the fee or otherwise 20 responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 27 //// 28 //// 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (th Cir. 1991). 4 | DATED: May 17, 2021 ~ 5 Htttenr— Lhor—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28