(PS) Hyon v. Brown ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Junho Hyon, No. 2:19-cv-00259-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 | Jerry Brown et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 The court received Mr. Hyon’s filing at ECF No. 31 and construes it as a motion for 18 | clarification under Federal Rule 60(a). See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) 19 || (“document filed pro se is ‘to be liberally construed’”) (citations omitted). Mr. Hyon states he 20 || was unable to find a document the “US Court of Appeal in San Francisco sent [the court] on 21 || September 25, 2020.” The court is unaware of the document Mr. Hyon references, and the court 22 | has no record on its docket of any United States Court of Appeals filing on that date. As the court 23 || cannot identify an error within its control, the motion is denied. 24 | DATED: April 30, 2021. 26 4 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28