(PC) Norsworthy v. Diaz ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHELLE-LAEL B. NORSWORTHY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00813-DAD-HBK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 vs. (Doc. No. 39) 10 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the court is the parties’ stipulation for plaintiff to file her first amended complaint, 13 incorporating motion to extend deadline to file amended complaint and attaching proposed amended 14 complaint filed April 29, 2021. (Doc. No. 39). The court’s scheduling order set a December 12, 2020 15 deadline to amend the pleadings. (Doc. No. 31 at 2). 16 Under Local Rule 144, the parties are required to receive court approval for extending deadlines 17 set by the court, and untimely extension requests are disfavored. The Ninth Circuit has held that such 18 requests should be evaluated under the good cause standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 16(b)(4). Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1294 (9th Cir. 2000). That rule states that “[a] 20 schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). 21 The court finds plaintiff has demonstrated good cause. Plaintiff’s counsel represents they began 22 discussions with defense counsel in October 2020 regarding filing an amended complaint. (Doc. No. 23 29-3 ¶ 2). A pandemic induced lockdown at plaintiff’s prison from Fall 2020 into Winter 2021 thwarted 24 plaintiff’s ability to timely amend her complaint because plaintiff’s counsel was unable to digitally 25 meet with her until January 7, 2021. (Id. ¶ 4). The finalization of the amended complaint was further 26 hindered by setbacks to plaintiff’s mental health. (Id. ¶ 5). Plaintiff represents defendants were 27 apprised of these delays, and defense counsel stipulates to the filing of an amended complaint. (Id. ¶¶ 28 1 7-10). Because the delays appear beyond plaintiff’s control, the court finds good cause to permit 2 || plaintiff an extension of time to file her amended complaint. 3 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 4 1. Plaintiff's motion to extend deadline to file amended complaint incorporated within the 5 parties’ Stipulation (Doc. No. 39) is GRANTED. 6 2. Plaintiff shall file her First Amended Complaint in the form attached to the Stipulation 7 within five (5) days of the date of this Order and serve a copy of the same upon Defendants. 8 3. Defendants’ responsive pleadings to the First Amended Complaint is due no later than 9 twenty-one (21) days after service is effectuated upon Defendant Secretary Allison. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. * WDated: _ May 10,2021 Mile. Wh fareh Zaskth 13 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2.