(PC) Miron v. Jackson ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARON MIRON, No. 2:21-cv-0501 KJM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JACKSON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed March 22, 2021, plaintiff was informed that his proposed complaint was 18 incomplete and did not bear his signature. He was granted thirty days leave to file a complete 19 complaint bearing his signature. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the order 20 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Thirty days from the order 21 passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: May 4, 2021 ‘ Frese Arn 5 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 | miro0501.tta 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28