(PC) Crump v. O'Campo ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] STEVE CRUMP, No. 2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 A. OCAMPO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an action brought 18 | under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2021, plaintiff renewed his motion for preliminary 19 || injunction. However, on March 15, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations 20 | addressing plaintiff's earlier motion for preliminary injunction, which was adopted by the district 21 | court on May 3, 2021, over plaintiffs objections. Plaintiff's renewed motion includes no new 22 | factual allegations, and fails to address any of the elements required under Winter v. Natural 23 || Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008). Rather, in his one paragraph motion, 24 | plaintiff simply repeats claims previously raised. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 25 | plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 44) is denied without prejudice. 26 || Dated: May 27, 2021 7 /ow/erum2343.pi2 Frees Aharon 28 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE