(PC) Talamantes v. Amador County Jail ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY M. TALAMANTES, No. 2:19-cv-1784 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order issued April 15, 2021, plaintiff was directed to file a completed affidavit in 18 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 5 at 2. At that time, plaintiff 19 was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed. See id. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the 21 court’s order and has not filed the required document. 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is 23 directed to assign a United States District Judge to this case, and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (th Cir. 1991). 4 | DATED: May 24, 2021 ~ 5 Htttenr— Lhor—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28