(PS) Liang v. Anderson ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KUANGHUEI LIANG, et al., No. 2:21–cv–0594–JAM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 5) 14 MICKEY ANDERSON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On May 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5), 18 which were served on the plaintiffs and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 21 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 22 novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 2 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend; and 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 7 8 DATED: June 1, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28