(PC) Hawkins v. Winkfield ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFF HAWKINS, No. 2:19-cv-1228 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. WINKFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On May 17, 2021, defendants Decker, Pendleton, Whipple, and Winkfield1 filed a motion 18 for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose 19 the motion.2 20 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 21 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 22 the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. On May 17, 2021, plaintiff was advised of the requirements 23 1 Defendant Troncoso is deceased. 24 2 On May 13, 2021, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Declaration in Opposition to Summary 25 Judgment Motion of Defendant,” in which he addresses the merits of his claims. (ECF No. 83.) However, plaintiff’s document, signed on May 7 and 8, 2021, cannot be construed as addressing 26 the pending motion for summary judgment because such motion was filed and served on May 17, 27 2021, after plaintiff’s opposition was written and filed. Plaintiff’s earlier-filed opposition also cannot be construed as opposing the pending motion because such motion is based on plaintiff’s 28 alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies rather than the merits of this action. 1 | for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 2 || waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en 3 || banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). 4 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 5 || imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 6 || the Court.” Id. In the order filed August 7, 2020, plaintiff was also advised that failure to comply 7 || with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. (ECF No. 37 8 | at8.) 9 Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 10 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move 11 to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and 12 any dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 13 19--operates as an adjudication on the merits. 14 |) Id. 15 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date 16 | of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. 17 || Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack 18 || of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules 19 || and acourt order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 20 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 21 | Dated: June 28, 2021 22 Al Norra 23 KENDALL J. Wha Mawk1228.nop UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28