(HC) Khademi v. Santoro ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:21-cv-0902 KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right 18 || to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th 19 | Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of 20 | the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. 21 | In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the 22 || appointment of counsel at the present time. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of 24 | counsel (ECF N. 11) is denied without prejudice. 25 | Dated: June 29, 2021 26 Aectl Aharon a7 KENDALL J.NE /ehad0902.110 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28