Williams v. County of Sacramento ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Lawrance A. Bohm (SBN: 208716) 1 lbohm@bohmlaw.com 2 Daniel T. Newman (SBN: 314937) dnewman@bohmlaw.com 3 Scott C. Zienty (SBN: 324661) szienty@bohmlaw.com 4 BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 5 4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95834 6 Telephone: 866.920.1292 Facsimile: 916.927.2046 7 Gregory R. Davenport (SBN: 154403) 8 grdatlaw@aol.com 9 LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY R. DAVENPORT 3439 Brookside Road, Suite 205 10 Stockton, California 95219 Telephone: 209.955.1999 11 Facsimile: 209.475.4951 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Thomas Williams 13 14 Van Longyear (SBN: 84189) Carl L. Fessenden (SBN: 161494) longyear@longyearlaw.com cfessenden@porterscott.com 15 Nicole M. Cahill (SBN: 287165) John R. Whitefleet (SBN: 213301) cahill@longyearlaw.com jwhitefleet@porterscott.com 16 LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP PORTER SCOTT 17 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 350 University Avenue, Ste. 200 Sacramento, CA 95864 Sacramento, CA 95825 18 Telephone: 916.974.8500 Telephone: 916.929.1481 Facsimile: 916.974.8510 Facsimile: 916.927.3706 19 Attorneys for Defendant, Attorneys for Defendant 20 County of Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova; Nathan Daniel; 21 Joseph Zalec; and Derek Hutchins UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 22 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 23 THOMAS WILLIAMS, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-KJN 24 Plaintiff, 25 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 26 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; CITY OF STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RANCHO CORDOVA; NATHAN DANIEL; 27 JOSEPH ZALEC; DEREK HUTCHINS; and Action Filed: March 18, 2020 28 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Trial Date: Not Set Defendants. ] The court APPROVES the parties’ stipulated protective order (ECF No. 21) subject to 2 || the following clarification. Once this action is closed, “unless otherwise ordered, the court will 3 || not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of” this protective order. E.D. Cal. 4 ||/R. 141.1(f). Courts in the district generally do not agree to retain jurisdiction after closure of 5 || the case. See, e.g., MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., 6 || Feb. 3, 2017). 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 || Dated: June 30, 2021 Foci) Aharon 10 KENDALL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {Prepesed} Order Regarding Stipulated Protective Order

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:20-cv-00598

Filed Date: 6/30/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024