(PC) Gleason v. Lynch ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:21-cv-00253-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF LYNCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Stanley Gleason (“Plaintiff”), a former inmate at California State Prison – 18 Sacramento, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302. 21 On May 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff 24 has not filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 28 /// 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued May 19, 2021 (ECF No. 7), are 5 | ADOPTED IN FULL, and 6 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 | DATE: July 7, 2021 yy /) Sn ( Take ll Troy L. Nuhlep> United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28