(PS) Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Investigation ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR. No. 2:21-cv-00141-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is an individual proceeding pro se in the 19 instant action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 23 fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has not filed timely objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 28 /// 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 12, 2021 (ECF No. 4), are ADOPTED 5 IN FULL; 6 2. This action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a 7 claim and failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 8 3. The Clerk’s office is directed to close this case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 | DATE: July 7, 2021 { J) /) 12 “ Wh Vokoy 13 Troy L. Nunley) 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28