(PC) Timberland v. Mascarenas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD TIMBERLAND, No. 1:16-cv-00922-NONE-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 25(a)(1) 13 vs. (Doc. No. 81.) 14 G. MASCARENAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Ronald Timberland is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this 19 action on June 27, 2016. (Doc. No. 1.) This case now proceeds with plaintiff’s second 20 amended complaint, filed on June 20, 2018, against defendant G. Mascarenas for failure to 21 protect plaintiff, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. No. 26.) 22 On March 1, 2021, defense counsel (“Counsel”) filed a “Notice of Suggestion of Death 23 of Plaintiff,” which states that Counsel was informed that plaintiff died on December 19, 2020. 24 (Doc. No. 81.) Counsel also states that a copy of the notice was served on plaintiff’s father, 25 Ramon Timberland, in the manner identified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The 26 attached proof of service indicates that plaintiff’s father was personally served on February 26, 27 2021. (Doc. No. 81-1). 28 ///// 1 “If a party dies and the claim is not thereby extinguished, the court may order 2 || substitution of the proper parties. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the 3 || decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of 4 ||a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Fed. R. 5 || Civ. P. 25(a)(1). 6 The party filing the notice of death (or “suggestion of death’) “must serve other parties 7 || and nonparty successors or representatives of the deceased with a suggestion of death in the 8 || same manner as required for service of the motion to substitute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). 9 || Thus, a party may be served the suggestion of death by service on his or her attorney, Fed. R. 10 || Civ. P. 5(b), while non-party successors or representatives of the deceased party must be served 11 || the suggestion of death in the manner provided by Rule 4 for the service of a summons.” 12 || Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994). “[T]he 90 day period provided by Rule 13 || 25(a)(1) will not be triggered against [the decedent’s] estate until the appropriate representative 14 || of the estate is served a suggestion of death in the manner provided by Federal Rule of Civil 15 || Procedure 4.” (Ud. at 233-34). 16 The notice of death was appropriately filed and served more than ninety days ago, and 17 motion for substitution has been made. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is 18 |] DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). 19 0 IT IS SO ORDERED. ~ ‘ae 21 Dated: _ July 19, 2021 wae — UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:16-cv-00922

Filed Date: 7/20/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024