Richardson, Jr. v. Ortiz ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VAN DARRIN RICHARDSON JR, Case No. 1:21-cv-00996 AWI JLT 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK vs. OF COURT TO REOPEN THIS CASE AND TO 13 CLOSE THIS CASE AS TO PENSKE TRUCK RICHARD ORTIZ, et al., LEASING COMPANY ONLY 14 (Doc. 9) Defendants. 15 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed without prejudice as to Penske Truck 18 Leasing Co. only and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of 19 Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. 20 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is 21 DIRECTED to reopen this case and to close this action as Penske Truck Leasing Co. only. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: July 27, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28