Bien v. City of Fresno ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN BIEN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01159-AWI-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (Doc. 31) 14 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 21, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation for protective order. (Doc. 31.) The Court 18 adopts the stipulated protective order submitted by the parties. The parties are advised that 19 pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any 20 documents subject to the protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written 21 request which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file 22 documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non- 23 dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos 24 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any 25 approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. 26 The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or 27 was deemed confidential. 28 /// 1 Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under the protective 2 order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. 3 . IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: July 28, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28