(PC) Connor v. CDC Mailroom Staff ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THYRONE CONNOR, No. 2:21-cv-0842 AC P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CDC MAILROOM STAFF, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By an order filed May 13, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis application or pay the filing fee and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 19 recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. After plaintiff failed to file a 20 completed application or pay the fee, he was given an additional twenty-one days to comply. 21 ECF No. 4. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an application 22 to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 24 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 | with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 4 | (9th Cir. 1991). 5 | DATED: August 2, 2021 4 te (A /, 6 ALLISON CLAIRE 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28