Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMUEL ROMERO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01490-DAD-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (Doc. 31) 14 WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 2, 2021, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. (Doc. 15.) Following 18 review, the Court adopts the stipulated protective order. The parties are advised that pursuant to 19 the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents 20 subject to the protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request 21 which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file 22 documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non- 23 dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos 24 v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any 25 approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. 26 The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or 27 was deemed confidential. 28 1 Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under the protective 2 order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: August 4, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28