(DP) Contreras v. Davis ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JORGE CONTRERAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01523-AWI-SAB 11 Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE 12 v. ORDER THAT RESPONDENT’S COUNSEL LODGE AMENDED STATE RECORD OR 13 RONALD DAVIS, Warden of California State SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO Prison at San Quentin, COMPLY 14 Respondent. Fourteen (14) Day Deadline 15 16 17 A review of the record in this action reveals that Respondent Warden Ron Davis, 18 through counsel Deputy Attorneys General Kenneth Sokoler and Christina Hitomi Simpson, 19 has not complied with the Court’s May 26, 2021 order denying Petitioner’s motion for 20 miscellaneous relief and directing that Respondent file an amended Notice of Lodging and 21 lodge Petitioner’s Revised Reporter’s Transcript on the Court’s electronic filing system by not 22 later than July 12, 2021. (ECF No. 72.) 23 The Court observes that Petitioner’s June 9, 2021 motion for District Judge 24 reconsideration of the May 26th order (ECF No. 75) was denied on July 29, 2021 (ECF No. 25 78). 26 Accordingly, Respondent is directed to amend the state record and state record index by 27 filing a Notice of Lodging and lodging the Revised Reporter’s Transcript in electronic format on the Court’s electronic filing system, in the manner previously directed by the Court, by not 1 | later than fourteen (14) days following the filed date of this order, or show cause by written 2 | response why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to do so. Chambers v. Nasco, 3 | Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43-46 (1991); Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 766 (1980); 4 | Fink v. Gomez, 239 F.3d 989, 991 (9th Cir. 2001); Thompson v. Housing Auth., 782 F.2d 829, 5 | 831 (9th Cir. 1986); Local Rules for the Eastern District of California, Rule 110. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAA (e_ 9 | Dated: _August 9, 2021 __ ef 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28