Chock v. Stryker Corporation ( 2021 )

D. Joshua Staub, Bar No. 170568 1 Law Office of D. Joshua Staub 2 13015 Washington Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90066 3 Telephone: (310) 929-5269 4 Attorney for Plaintiff D. Malama Chock 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D. MALAMA CHOCK, ) Case No. 1:21-CV-00996-DAD-JLT 11 ) Plaintiff, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING 12 ) THE ACTION AS TO STRYER vs. ) ORTHOPAEDICS AND STRYKER 13 ) GMBH ONLY STRYKER CORPORATION, A ) 14 MICHIGAN CORPORATION; ) (Doc. 9) STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, AN ) 15 ENTITY OF UNKNOWN FORM; ) STRYKER GMBH, A SWISS ) 16 COMPANY, ) ) 17 Defendants. ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order 2 The parties stipulated to the action being dismissed as to Stryker 3 Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only. (Doc. 11) The Federal Rules of Civil 4 Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order 5 of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 6 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Stryker 7 Orthopaedics and Stryker GMBH only. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: August 9, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 11 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28