(PC) Price v. Barnes ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASHLEY LUTHER MURRAY PRICE, No. 2:21-cv-0052 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RON BARNES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a prisoner civil rights action under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims his rights were violated in connection with his extradition to 19 Arizona. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On March 22, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 22 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 23 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 26 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 27 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 28 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 1 | ....°). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 22, 2021, are adopted in full; and 5 2. This action is dismissed as frivolous. 6 | DATED: August 16, 2021. 7 g l ti / ¢ q_/ 9 CHIEF NT] ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28