Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Mountain Addiction, LLC ( 2021 )

1 JOHN L. MARSHALL (Cal. Bar No. 145570) TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY 2 128 Market Street Stateline Nevada, 89449 3 Tel: (775) 303-4882 jmarshall@trpa.gov 4 MARSHA A. BURCH (Cal. Bar No. 170298) 5 LAW OFFICE OF MARSHA A. BURCH 131 S. Auburn Street Grass Valley, CA 95945 6 Tel: (530) 272-8411 mburchlaw@gmail.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, ) Case No. 2:20-cv-00945-TLN-KJN ) 13 Plaintiff, ) ) 14 vs. ) SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER ) TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 15 MOUNTAIN ADDICTION LLC, JUSTIN ) SHEAF, ) 16 ) Judge: Honorable Troy L. Nunley Defendants. ) 17 ) ) 18 ) 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 143 the parties stipulate and ask the Court to Order that the order 21 entered on July 13, 2021 (Dkt. No. 30)1 be modified by extending the discovery and dispositive 22 23 1 “Dkt. No.” refers to the docket number entry for the Court’s electronic filing system. 24 1 motions deadlines by an additional 120 days, to December 17, 2021, and June 20, 2022, 2 respectively. 3 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of 4 litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc. (9th Cir. 1992) 975 F.2d 604, 607 (citation 5 and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified 6 only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may 7 be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the 8 extension.’” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co. (9th Cir. 2002) 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 9 (quoting Johnson, 975 F.2d at 607). 10 Good cause exists for this extension. The parties have required some additional time to 11 respond to discovery, and there has been cooperation in this regard. 12 For these reasons, the parties ask the Court to extend the discovery deadline to December 13 17, 2021, and the dispositive motion deadline to June 20, 2022. 14 15 DATED: August 16, 2021. Respectfully submitted, TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY 16 By: /s/ John L. Marshall 17 Attorney for Plaintiff, 18 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency jmarshall@trpa.gov 19 DATED: August 16, 2021. Respectfully submitted, 20 LAW OFFICE OF MARSHA A. BURCH 21 By: /s/ Marsha A. Burch 22 Attorney for Plaintiff, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 23 mburchlaw@gmail.com 24 1 DATED: August 16, 2021. Respectfully submitted, PORTER SIMON, 2 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3 By: /s/ Lou Basile 4 Attorney for Defendants, Mountain Addiction, LLC and 5 Justin Sheaf basile@portersimon.com 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. The discovery deadline 1s extended to December 17, 2021, and 8 the dispositive motion deadline is extended to June 20, 2022. 9 Dated: August 17, 2021 ry /) San Tok 4 i NMA 11 _ } aw Troy L. Nunley) } United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER