Doe v. Adams ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-NONE-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND 12 TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIMOTHY v. BEACH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 13 DERRAL ADAMS, et al., ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO 14 ADDRESS READINESS FOR Defendants. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND NEED 15 FOR MOTION TO FILE PSEUDONYMOUSLY 16 (ECF No. 7) 17 18 19 On August 19, 2021, a stipulation was filed extending the time for Defendant Timothy 20 Beach to file a responsive pleading until October 14, 2021, to allow for the investigation of the 21 merits of the case. (ECF No. 7.) The Court finds good cause to approve the stipulated request. 22 The scheduling conference is set in this matter for October 19, 2021 and the joint scheduling 23 report is due one week prior. If the parties do not expect to be in a position to move forward 24 with the scheduling conference, they shall file a joint request to continue the scheduling 25 conference on or before the date the joint scheduling report is due. The parties shall also address 26 the need for a motion to file pseudonymously in the scheduling report and be prepared to address 27 such motion at the scheduling conference. / / / een ne een enn nnn nn nn EEE OO 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and finding good cause, IT IS HEREBY 2 | ORDERED that: 3 1. Defendant Timothy Beach shall file a pleading responsive to the complaint on or 4 before October 14, 2021; 5 2. If the parties are not in a position to move forward with the October 19, 2021 6 scheduling conference, they shall file a joint request to continue the scheduling 7 conference on or prior to the date the joint scheduling report is due; and 8 3. The parties shall address the need for a motion to file pseudonymous pleadings in 9 the scheduling report.! 10 i IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 12 | Dated: _August 20, 2021 _ Of UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ' Plaintiff did not file a motion to file pseudonymous pleadings in this action. The parties should be prepared to address this issue, and be prepared to set a filing date and briefing schedule for such motion, if opposed, or file an unopposed motion that satisfies the applicable legal standards. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a); Doe v. Kamehameha 27 Schools (“Kamehameha Schools”), 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010); Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile 28 Corp. (“Advanced Textile Corp.”), 214 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2000).