(PC) Giraldes v. Bobbala ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Larry Giraldes, No. 2:17-cv-02602 KJM EFB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. M. Bobbala, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The motion to enforce the settlement agreement is denied for lack of subject matter 18 | jurisdiction. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994) 19 | (“[E]nforcement of the settlement agreement is for state courts, unless there is some independent 20 | basis for federal jurisdiction.”) 21 This order resolves ECF No. 82. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: October 7, 2021. / 24 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE