(PC) Rodriguez v. Ralph Diaz ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNATHAN C. RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:20-cv-1650 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed July 19, 2021 the undersigned adopted the April 13, 2020 Screening Order 18 (ECF No. 10), which was issued by a magistrate judge in the Central District of California, and 19 found that the complaint did not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff was given thirty 20 days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 21 recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. After plaintiff failed to file an amended 22 complaint, he was given an additional twenty-one days to amend the complaint and warned that 23 failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further 24 warning. ECF No. 18. Twenty-one days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 25 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 27 randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. 28 //// ] IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a 2 | claim for the reasons set forth in the April 13, 2020 Screening Order (ECF No. 10). See L.R. 3 || 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 6 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 7 || with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 8 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 9 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 10 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 | DATED: October 12, 2021 ~ 12 Chthwen— Clare ALLISON CLAIRE 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28