- nnn nn III EE III IE EIEIO I EE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on FILED MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Oct 25, 2021 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —292) On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,419 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is ndin his time, th ao eray is ited. stimenine Cel. Z “UL Oct 25, 2021 CLERK'S OFFICE John W. Nichols MUCTIDISTRIGT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel | hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California by: WPL. Deputy Clerk Pate: 10/25/2021 IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 SCHEDULE CTO−292 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 21−01824 Kirby v. Monsanto Company ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 21−04342 Francis v. Monsanto Company, Inc. ILN 1 21−05186 Michael v. Monsanto Company, Inc MINNESOTA MN 0 21−02220 Estate of Anthony Magusin v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02221 Rajsky v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02229 Stofiel v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02230 Bacco v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02244 Dobson v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02260 Page v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02261 Robinson v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02271 Indilicato v. Monsanto Company MN 0 21−02272 Menard v. Monsanto Company NEW MEXICO NM 2 21−00994 Renteria v. Monsanto Company et al Opposed 10/18/21 NEW YORK WESTERN NYW 1 21−01110 Struzik, et al v. Monsanto Company, et al
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:21-cv-01824
Filed Date: 10/25/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024