(PC) Garrett v. Unknown ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAMEO L. GARRETT, No. 2:21-cv-1625 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se. On September 22, 2021, plaintiff was 18 ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his inmate trust account 19 statement, or pay the court’s filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 20 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 21 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents or paid 22 the filing fee. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 24 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 | with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 3 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 4 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 || Dated: November 8, 2021 Foci) Aharon 7 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /garr1625.fifp 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28