(PC) Meador v. Mendez ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GORDON DALE MEADOR, No. 2:19-cv-0587 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 P. MENDEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 10, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Under Local Rule 182(f), service of 27 documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 ///// ] The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 2 | 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 3 || novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by 4 || the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 5 || ....”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 6 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The findings and recommendations issued September 10, 2021 (ECF No. 22), are 9 | ADOPTED in full, and 10 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 | 41(b). 12 | DATED: November 12, 2021 13 14 ee 3 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:19-cv-00587

Filed Date: 11/12/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024