(PS) Rivera v. California Community Housing Agency ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE RIVERA; CARMEN No. 2:21-cv-00651-TLN-CKD MARTINEZ, 12 ORDER Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY HOUSING 15 AGENCY, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On October 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 19 No. 14), which were served on the Plaintiffs and which contained notice that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 14.) No 21 objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See 22 Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of 23 law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th 24 Cir. 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 14) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 1 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to effect timely service; and 2 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 3 | DATE: November 29, 2021 4 /) 5 “ I of Lor ° Troy L. Nunley ] 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28