(PC) Hosley v. Hill ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DASHEME KAREME HOSLEY No. 2:21-cv-00362-JAM-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 HILL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed June 29, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 7. The court granted plaintiff an additional 30 19 day period of time to file an amended complaint by order dated September 22, 2021. ECF No. 20 13. That thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 21 otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 23 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 | (9th Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: December 6, 2021 Card Kt | La Ly (g— 4 CAROLYN K.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12/hosl0362.fta.2nd.docx 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28