(PC) Tunstall v. Alexander ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, JR, No. 2:21-cv-1701 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 M. ALEXANDER et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed October 26, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty 18 days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. ECF No. 9. 19 The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (th Cir. 1991). 4 | DATED: December 13, 2021 ~ 5 Ctlhter— Lane ALLISON CLAIRE 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28