- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:20–cv–2481–TLN–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 26) 14 LAURA BYNUM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 against the Siskiyou County Clerk-Registrar of Voters and two Siskiyou County residents.1 Two 19 of the defendants, Laura Bynum and Robert Puckett, Sr., have a pending motion to dismiss 20 plaintiff’s first amended complaint, set for remote hearing on January 25, 2022.2 (ECF Nos. 18, 21 19, 24.) 22 On December 6, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion to strike portions of defendant Bynum’s 23 materials in support of the motion to dismiss, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). (ECF 24 1 Actions where a party proceeds without counsel are referred to a magistrate judge 25 pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. This case was reassigned to the undersigned upon the recusal of the previously assigned magistrate 26 judge. (ECF No. 10.) 27 2 The third defendant, Robert Winston, has yet to enter an appearance in this case, and the 28 court is awaiting word from the U.S. Marshal as to the status of service on him. 1 No. 26.) Plaintiff requests that the court strike certain portions of defendant Bynum’s brief in 2 support of the motion, and “misleading matters” in Bynum’s accompanying request for judicial 3 notice and declaration of Jeffrey Chiao. (Id.; see ECF Nos. 18.1 – 18.3.) On December 15, 2021, 4 defendant Bynum filed an opposition. (ECF No. 27.) 5 Rule 12(f) permits the court to “strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any 6 redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) (emphasis 7 added). “Under the express language of [Rule 12(f)], only pleadings are subject to motions to 8 strike.” Sidney–Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co., 697 F.2d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 1983). Rule 7(a) limits 9 the definition of “pleadings” to complaints, third-party complaints, answers, and replies to 10 answers. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). 11 “[A] ‘motion to strike’ must be aimed at the parties’ pleadings, not the text within the 12 parties’ briefs.” Exxon Mobil Corp. v. New W. Petroleum L.P., No. CIV. 03-02222 WBS EFB, 13 2008 WL 2561599, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 26, 2008). Such motions also cannot be used to strike 14 an affidavit or declaration, as these are not pleadings. See Yount v. Regents University, Inc., 15 2009 WL 995596, at *11-12 (D. Ariz. 2009) (denying motion to strike affidavit because an 16 affidavit is not a pleading (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), 12(f)); Utley v. Continental Divide 17 Outfitters, 2009 WL 631465, at *2 (D. Idaho Mar. 10, 2009) (noting that Rule 12(f) “cannot be 18 used to strike an affidavit”). For the same reason, plaintiff’s motion also is not properly brought 19 with respect to defendant Bynum’s request for judicial notice. Although technically filed on the 20 docket, such a request for judicial notice is just that: a request. 21 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike is denied and no further briefing is required. 22 However, plaintiff is free to include her present arguments in her forthcoming brief in opposition 23 to the pending motion to dismiss, if she wishes. C.f., New W. Petroleum, 2008 WL 2561599, at 24 *1 (“Rather than attempt to strike, add, modify, or rewrite portions of the parties’ briefs, the 25 preferable approach is simply for the court to ignore arguments in the briefs which are irrelevant 26 to the issues.”). Plaintiff’s opposition to the pending motion to dismiss remains due on or before 27 January 4, 2022, as previously set. 28 /// 1 ORDER 2 It is HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. Plaintiff's motion to strike (ECF No. 26) is DENIED as procedurally improper; and 4 2. The hearing on that motion noticed for January 5, 2022, is VACATED. 5 | Dated: December 20, 2021 Foci) Aharon 7 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 olso.2481 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:20-cv-02481
Filed Date: 12/20/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024