(PC) Reyna v. Kings County Jail ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN REYNA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00203-DAD-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING CONSTRUED MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA 13 v. (Doc No. 20) 14 KINGS COUNTY JAIL, WENDY BATCHELOR and NAEEM SIDDIQI, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE 15 SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM BY Defendants. CERTIFIED MAIL, UPS OR FEDEX 16 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO 17 PROVIDE SERVICE ADDRESSES WITHIN 60 DAYS 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff John Reyna is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 22 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s 23 medical deliberate indifference claim against Defendants Kings County Jail, and two medical 24 defendants, Wendy Batchelor, N.P., and Naeem Siddiqi, M.D. (Doc No. 6). 25 On July 1, 2020, the Court ordered service on all three Defendants by the United States 26 Marshals. (Doc No. 8). On August 14, 2020, the Process and Receipt and Return (Form 285) for 27 Defendants Wendy Batchelor and Naeem Siddiqi were both returned as unexecuted because 28 defendants "no longer work” at Kings County Jail. (Doc. Nos. 9-10). On November 8, 2021, the 1 Court directed Kings County Jail to provide the forwarding addresses for Batchelor and Siddiqi. 2 (Doc. No. 17). On November 19, 2021, Kings County Jail advised the Court that Batchelor and 3 Siddiqi “have never been employees if County of Kings” but “were employed by Naphcare, Inc.” 4 (Doc. No. 18). On December 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting additional time to 5 effectuate service upon Batchelor and Siddiqi in order that he may obtain information of the 6 unserved defendants current and/or last known mailing address and any identifying information 7 that would assist him in locating them. (Doc. No. 20). The Court construes the motion as a 8 request for issuance of subpoena duces tecum. 9 “A command in a subpoena to produce documents, electronically stored information, or 10 tangible things requires the responding person to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling 11 of the materials.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(1)(D). “If the subpoena commands the production of 12 documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the inspection of premises 13 before trial, then before it is served on the person to whom it is directed, a notice and a copy of 14 the subpoena must be served on each party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4). 15 Under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[p]arties may obtain discovery 16 regarding any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and 17 proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the 18 action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ 19 resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or 20 expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). 21 “Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be 22 discoverable.” Id. 23 A subpoena duces tecum may be served by certified mail. See Ott v. City of Milwaukee, 24 682 F.3d 552, 557 (7th Cir. 2012) (examining the plain language of Rule 45 for support of service 25 of subpoena by mail and finding “no reason to inflate the costs of litigation by ruling out this 26 sensible option for serving a subpoena (along with the necessary fees) and requiring parties to 27 hire a second person for service, at least in the absence of any language in the Rule that compels 28 such a result”). Likewise, the undersigned finds support for the service of a subpoena by certified 1 mail or FedEx in the plain language of Rule 45. 2 The U.S. Marshals’ Service (USMS) typically handles Court requests for service of 3 subpoenas and summons. These requests are burdensome, time-consuming and place significant 4 demands on limited USMS resources. Under Federal Rule of Procedure 1, the Court is charged 5 with securing the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 6 The undersigned judge finds that service of a subpoena duces tecum by certified mail or FedEx 7 will further advance these objectives. 8 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 9 1. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s construed motion for issuance of a subpoena. 10 (Doc. No. 20.) 11 2. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to fill out, issue and serve an AO 88B 12 form as follows: 13 a. The Caption on the subpoena shall be set to this case; 14 b. “To:” shall be set to “Naphcare, Inc. 2090 Columbiana Road, Suite 4000, 15 Birmingham, AL 35216.” 16 c. “Production:” shall be set to: “All documents regarding defendants Wendy 17 Batchelor, N.P., and Naeem Siddiqi, M.D. (who worked at the Kings County Jail in or 18 around January 1, 2020) contact information, including but not limited to their current and/or last known mailing address and any identifying information that would assist in 19 locating them”; 20 d. “Place:” shall be set to Plaintiff’s address as listed on the docket sheet: 21 #1008117, Kings County Jail, P.O. Box 1699, Hanford, CA 93239; 22 e. “Date and Time:” shall be set to “14 days after receipt”; 23 3. The Clerk shall serve the subpoena, along with a copy of this order, by mailing the 24 subpoena, by either certified mail, UPS, or FedEx (signature required), to the entity named in the 25 subpoena; 26 4. The Clerk shall file a Notice of tracking number on the docket sheet and serve the 27 Notice upon Plaintiff. 28 1 5. The Court further ORDERS Plaintiff to file a Notice on the docket containing the 2 | service addresses for defendants Wendy Batchelor, N.P., and Naeem Siddiqi, M.D. within 60 3 | days of this Order. Upon receipt of the service addresses, the Court will then direct the USMS to 4 | attempt service. If no information or request for more time is received from Plaintiff within 60 5 | days, the Court will recommend dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal 6 | Rules of Civil Procedure. 7 6. Recognizing that the last known addresses may be the Defendant’s home address, 8 | Naphcare, Inc. may provide the addresses directly to the Clerk within fourteen (14) days. 9 7. The Clerk shall mail a courtesy copy of this Order to: Bradley J. Cain, Esq., 10 | General Counsel - Naphcare, Inc., 2090 Columbiana Road, Suite 4000, Birmingham, AL 35216. 11 '? | Dated: _ December 20, 2021 Wile. Th. foareh Yack 13 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28