Ketzler v. Faucher ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHANNES KETZLER and NIKO GROTH, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0430 BAK (SKO) ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. ) 14 ROBERT ROYAL FAUCHER, ) (Doc. 30) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 On December 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 30.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th 22 Cir. 1997); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, 23 the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: January 7, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28