(PC) Warren v. Kanwar Singh ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS WARREN, No. 2:20-cv-0127 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 KELLY KANWAR SINGH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 23, 2021, plaintiff was granted until December 27, 2021 to file an amended 18 complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 19 recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 21 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 24 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 25 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 26 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 2 || 1991). 3 || Dated: January 10, 2022 ( aie } ft | Ld (g—, 4 CAROLYN K DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 warr0127.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28