Saenz v. Aramark Campus, LLC ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | JARED SAENZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01462-DAD-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 13 | ARAMARK CAMPUS, LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendant. (ECF No. 12) 15 16 On January 13, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 | has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 | 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or | attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. | Dated: _ January 13, 2022 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28