(PS) Expose v. Weifebach ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, No. 2:21-cv-00699-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DIANE WIEFENBACH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff has 20 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 4.) 21 The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 22 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are 23 reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the 24 file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the 25 proper analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 24, 2021, (ECF No. 3), are adopted 3 | in full; 4 2. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 6 7 DATED: January 24, 2022 8 /) 9 “ ! Lu 10 Troy L. Nunley ] 11 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28