(HC) Vasquez v. Frauenheim ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALVADOR B. VASQUEZ, No. 2:17-cv-2579 KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, 15 Respondents. 16 17 By order filed January 6, 2022, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, 18 why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner 19 has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this 21 case. 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 1 | objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 2 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 3 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: February 14, 2022 Foci) Aharon 6 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ' /vasq2579.fsc.hab 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28