(PC) Johnson v. Arabia ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENRY CHARLES JOHNSON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-2221 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOHN ARABIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 26, 2019, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within 18 thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Arabia, Williams, Lee 19 and Warren. That thirty day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 20 order. 21 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 22 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 27 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 28 ///// 1 | may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: October 8, 2019 Po Pg, fF /- it LE 9 4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 | 1 9 john02221.fusm 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28