(PC) Sharonoff v. Tyler ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH ALLEN SHARONOFF, No. 2:19-cv-1239 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 THOMAS TYLER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed August 27, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff 19 has not filed an amended complaint. 20 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 21 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 | time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 | Cir. 1991). Dated: October 16, 2019 Lad 1 CANO. KM. 9 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 9 shar 1239.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28