BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Billan-Pahal Corporation ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 | BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., Case No. 1:19-cv-00140-DAD-EPG 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS GURDEEP 10] v. BILLAN, RANJODH BILLAN, AND BILLAN-PAHAL CORPORATION 11 WITHOUT PREJUDICE BILLAN-PAHAL CORPORATION, et al., 12 (ECF No. 19) Defendants. 13 14 15 On November 8, 2019, Plaintiff, BMO Harris Bank, N.A., filed a notice of voluntary 16 | dismissal without prejudice of Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 17 | Corporation. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 1g | Corporation have not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in 19 | light of the notice, the case against Defendants Gurdeep Billan, Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal 29 | Corporation has ended and they are dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. 91 | Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of 79 | the Court is respectfully directed to designate on the docket that Defendants Gurdeep Billan, 23 | Ranjodh Billan, and Billan-Pahal Corporation have been terminated from this action as of the 74 | date this order is entered. T IS SO ORDERED. 25 26| Dated: _November 13, 2019 [sf Sy — 37 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28