(PS) Bumagat v. Shillinger ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 MAYNARD EDRALIN BUMAGAT, No. 2:17-cv-02008-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF Nos. 86, 91) 14 TERRY SCHILLINGER, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Maynard Edralin Bumagat (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above- 18 entitled action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On November 7, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 91.) Neither party has 23 filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 27 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 /// 1 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 2 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 7, 2019 (ECF No. 91), are 5 adopted in full; 6 2. The case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7 41(b); and 8 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: December 2, 2019 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28