(PS)Patterson v. Family Connection Christian Adoption ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LISA MARIE PATTERSON, No. 2:19-cv-1750-KJM-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 FAMILY CONNECTION CHRISTIAN ADOPTION, et at., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On November 4, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 19 No. 4), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 21 filed. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 23 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 24 novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by 25 the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 26 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 2 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED; 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2.) is DENIED; 6 3. The action is dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 DATED: December 2, 2019. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28