Vargas v. Binnewies ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | ESTATE OF ARMANDO VARGAS, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01240-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 | DOUG BINNEWIES, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 86) 16 17 Plaintiff, Estate of Armando Vargas and Gloria Redondo, and Defendants, Doug 18 | Binnewies, Codie Hart, Julia Patterson, Deputy Cooper, Deputy Reeder, Deputy Day, Deputy 19 | Detrich, and Deputy Jay, have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice 20 | (ECF No. 86). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. 21 | See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 22 | Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 23 T IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: December 9, 2019 [sl ey 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28