Rassamni v. Fresno Auto Spa, Inc. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 A.J. RASSAMNI, Case No. 1:18-cv-00738-LJO-EPG 8 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR v. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 10 PREJUDICE FRESNO AUTO SPA, INC, ef al., 11 Defendants. (ECF No. 51) 12 13 A stipulation for voluntary dismissal of the entire action with prejudice has been filed by 14 | Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, A.J. Rassamni; and by Defendants, Counter-Claimants, and 15 | Third-Party Plaintiffs Fresno Auto Spa Inc. and Stevan Matijevich. (ECF No. 51.) Thus, the 16 | case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant, Counter-Claimants, and Third- 17 | Party Plaintiffs Fresno Auto Spa Inc. and Stevan Matijevich. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); 18 | Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Further, because Third-Party 19 | Defendant, Juan Ramirez, has not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, 209 | the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice as to Third-Party Defendant Juan Ramirez. 21 | Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 2 As requested by the parties, the Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes 23 | of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement referred to in the stipulation for voluntary 34 | dismissal. T IS SO ORDERED. 25 26| Dated: _ January 8, 2020 [sf Sy — 37 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27