(HC) Moreland v. Unknown ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RALPH D. MORELAND, No. 2:19-cv-02290 GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. The matter was referred to the United 18 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). 19 On November 12, 2019, petitioner filed a motion for extension of time to file his writ of 20 habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. On December 9, 2019, the court denied the motion for extension of 21 time and granted petitioner thirty days from the date of the order to file an in forma pauperis 22 affidavit or pay the required filing fee and file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to 23 properly commence his federal habeas action. ECF No. 3. Petitioner was warned that failure to 24 comply with the court’s order and deadlines would result in a recommendation that this matter be 25 dismissed. Id. at 3. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 26 prosecute this case. 27 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk assign a district judge to this case; 28 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 1 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 2 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 7 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 8 fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections 9 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 10 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 Dated: January 30, 2020 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 12 UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28